This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Patch, Fortran] PR 55072: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 00:52:37 +0100
Subject: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55072: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

Hi all,

here is a patch for a pretty bad wrong-code regression, which affects
all maintained releases of gfortran. For discussion see bugzilla.

Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for 4.6, 4.7 and trunk?

Cheers,
Janus



2012-12-15  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/55072
    * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_parameter): No packing was done for
    full arrays of derived type.


2012-12-15  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/55072
    * gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90: Fix test case.
    * gfortran.dg/internal_pack_13.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/internal_pack_14.f90: New test.

Attachment: pr55072_v4.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: internal_pack_13.f90
Description: Binary data

Attachment: internal_pack_14.f90
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55072: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]