This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR fortran/51727: make module files reproducible, question on C++ in gcc

From: Tobias SchlÃter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:02:46 +0100
Subject: Re: PR fortran/51727: make module files reproducible, question on C++ in gcc
References: <50796BF5.4060100@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <CAO9iq9FU6wu8n5kYN=36Z_JVO=guVb=XxGR_NSm5H81nVHMg6Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

On 2012-10-14 23:35, Janne Blomqvist wrote:

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias SchlÃter
<tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
- Personally, I'd prefer the C++ version; The C++ standard library is
widely used and documented and using it in favour of rolling our own
is IMHO a good idea.

After receiving no reply for two weeks and two pings of my attempts at addressing Jakub's complaint about error handling in the STL (which, I might add, is explicitly allowed by the coding standard) went unanswered, I committed the C-only version after re-testing.

It's my first commit by means of git, please alert me of any problems.

Cheers,
- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR fortran/51727: make module files reproducible, question on C++ in gcc
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]