This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:43:40 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan
References: <50544E8A.5040704@net-b.de> <50549E90.7000204@sfr.fr> <5054BC84.7040203@net-b.de> <5055A5FD.5040005@sfr.fr>

Mikael Morin wrote:

On 15/09/2012 19:36, Tobias Burnus wrote:

As a pre-script: Will you look at Paul's revised assignment patch - or
should I do it?

I looked at it twice or so, and couldn't get the double temporary thing.
I'll get back to it.

Thanks!

Thanks for the analysis. Will you create a patch?
Attached. Tested against "*namelist*" and full regression test in
progress. OK?

OK. Thanks for the patch.

Tobias

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan
  - From: Mikael Morin
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Fix some issues found by Coverity's static-code analysis scan
  - From: Mikael Morin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]