This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40881 - Add two F95 obsolescence warnings


On 08/14/2012 11:57 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
On 14/08/2012 11:33, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Thus, I removed ST_LABEL_ENDDO_TARGET, use "=type" and added a comment,
but I didn't do the verify_st_order change.

Build and regested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?

OK, apart for:
	* gfortran.dg/data_constraints_1.f90: Update dg-warning.
I don't see the need for the change, the ChangeLog doesn't match the
patch, and it is different from the initial version. A forgotten local edit?

No, just the wrong (?) solution to a real issue. The -pedantic flag causes the obsolescent warning. To avoid it, one can either remove the "allocate" or one uses
! { dg-options "" }
I think the latter is cleaner.


I will commit the patch with the latter and a fixed ChangeLog.

Tobias


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]