This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:09:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of richard.guenther@gmail.com designates 10.42.73.136 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=richard.guenther@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=richard.guenther@gmail.com
- References: <1330696891-32461-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <20120302140535.GC18768@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> PR testsuite/16464 notes that some g77/*.f that contain loops were not
>> compiled with loop flags.
>> Compiling only testcases with loop optimization that contain
>> "endfor/enddo" will lead to ~25% fewer tests (some 30000 instead of
>> previously 40000).
>>
>> Testing in progess, ok if this completes successfully?
>
> There are tons of other loop constructs in Fortran, so I don't think this is
> a good idea.
Indeed. The focus on -O2 testing seems odd to me though, as well as
doing -g only at -O3. But well ...
Richard.