This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/49268
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "Langton, Asher" <langton2 at llnl dot gov>
- Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:52:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/49268
- References: <CA0D5198.6BFE%langton2@llnl.gov> <CA125797.6C82%langton2@llnl.gov>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:14:39AM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote:
> On 6/2/11 2:42 PM, "Langton, Asher" <langton2@llnl.gov> wrote:
> >On 6/2/11 2:11 PM, "Steve Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:59:03PM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote:
> >>> This patch fixes a bug where the wrong code was generated for
> >>>assumed-size
> >>> Cray pointees. The fix is simple, but a bit ugly. Bootstrapped and
> >>> regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for trunk?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Asher
> >>>
> >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langton2@llnl.gov>
> >>>
> >>> PR fortran/49268
> >>> * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Treat assumed-size
> >>>Cray
> >>> pointees as AS_EXPLICIT.
> >>>
> >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langton2@llnl.gov>
> >>>
> >>> PR fortran/49268
> >>> * gfortran.dg/PR49268.f90: New test.
> >>
> >>OK.
> >
> >Committed at revision 174584.
>
> A gfortran user here at LLNL asked if this could be backported to the 4.6
> branch. I bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> Okay for 4.6?
OK.
--
Steve