This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Constructor patch

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Damian Rouson <damian at rouson dot net>
Cc: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:46:45 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] Constructor patch
References: <4CC7C36F.8060304@net-b.de> <AANLkTin06vJFJi+8EwTzJrUnLwWnp66ZYW39HFWmrod4@mail.gmail.com> <4CC84D49.8030007@net-b.de> <AANLkTin2oew02SX90XL7zr4P=RAQaDvx0EYe_HsJZiYy@mail.gmail.com>

Damian Rouson wrote:

Thanks for copying me on this.  I'm excited to see the progress. A
test case is attached to this e-mail.

Works. The commented line, ! a = mycomplex(argument=5.6, modulus=1.0) only worked after I also removed the "private" from the mycomplex_module, which was to be expected.

The test is nice as it works -- and as I had actually forgotten that one can have also a program where the generic procedure and the structure constructor have an ambiguous interface, which is only distinguished by the keywords=.

Tobias

PS: I have now fixed the IMPORT issue, which brings down the failures from 51 to 29. I assume some of the remaining failures will be more difficult, but let's see...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Constructor patch
  - From: Damian Rouson

References:
- [RFC] Constructor patch
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [RFC] Constructor patch
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [RFC] Constructor patch
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [RFC] Constructor patch
  - From: Damian Rouson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]