This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: gfortran test coverage
- From: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Daniel Kraft <d at domob dot eu>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:16:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: gfortran test coverage
- References: <4C9DD785.email@example.com>
On Saturday 25 September 2010 13:05:41 Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Do you think it would be worthwhile to investigate the
> coverage data further and try to extend the test-suite so that coverage
> goes up and/or remove dead code that is really unreachable? (Or replace
> branches by asserts, for instance.)
> If you
> want, I volunteer to spend some time (I'll probably not have a lot, but
> possibly regularly small chunks) on that during stage 3 (which seems to
> fit for that, also).
Thanks, preferably early stage 3 from my point of view: it is easy to
introduce regressions while doing this as not-reached-by-the-testsuite is not
exactly the same as not-reachable. We have proofs of that every day with new
bug reports coming in. ;-)
> And of course I can send the gcov output to anyone
> interested to look at it, too.
I surely could use it, instead of adding a gcc_unreachable() somewhere and
running the testsuite.
If you plan to update it from time to time, maybe you could put it somewhere
publicly available ?