This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Proposal for e-mail to SC list about licensing questions for libquad.


Tobias Schlüter wrote:

On 2010-09-06 19:13, Toon Moene wrote:

The problem I currently have is that it is hard to *prove* that fdlibm
and gdtoa are distributed under the BSD license (and exactly which one)
- I cannot find a document that contains the exact license text.

from a random fdlibm file: /* * ==================================================== * Copyright (C) 2004 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this * software is freely granted, provided that this notice * is preserved. * ==================================================== */

Thanks - I was looking for a LICENSE file outside of the source code (obviously a bias of working with FSF code only).


Is that not sufficient? Likewise you can find the two-clause BSD licence of gdtoa in the source files you linked to. As for Cephes, that's not owned by the FSF, but it's used in glibc IIUC. I've not dug deeper, but given that it's on netlib, you will find the licence in the source code.

Yes, I think this is sufficient.


I think the real problem, as far as the FSF is concerned, is: what licence shall we put the parts of the library that we (i.e. FX) wrote ourselves? GPL + exception, probably, as the FSF always wants the strongest licence that fits the purpose. But this infers the question: if Cephes was modified in glibc, can we import the changes and relicence under GPL + e?

Yes, that is why I am asking. I do agree that I would be much (to not use a stronger word) surprised if the FSF wouldn't agree to license FX's work (which *is* a derived work of this code) under GPL+exception.


What we try to prevent is for everything to be in trunk - and people using it - and then suddenly, a lawyer at the FSF decides that we cannot do this (and we have to pull it out shortly before the release of 4.6).

Cheers,

--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]