Re: [patch, fortran] PR41859 ICE on invalid expression involving DT with pointer components in I/O

[Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>]

On 08/18/2010 06:30 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > Dear Jerry,
> >
> > > OK for trunk?
> >
> > OK but for one tiny question:
> >
> > Should you not check for parentheses, just to stop the code trying to
> > charge down, for example, binary operators? Since expr1 has been
> > resolved already at the top of resolve_code, this should not matter -
> > it's just unnecessary.
>
> I was thinking of a case like this:
>
> print *, (-p)
>
> Where p is invalid. We need to drill down to run the check on it.
I decided to try the above case and it gets caught earlier by unary operator 
checks so your suggestion should work well.  I will regression test it and 
commit if OK.

Jerry