This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
[fortran] Fix comment in f95-lang.c
- From: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:40:51 +0200
- Subject: [fortran] Fix comment in f95-lang.c
Since I'm currently working on the topic of builtins in the Fortran front-end:
To close PR43040 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43040), I've checked that the comment below in f95-lang.c is incorrect. We do indeed define the family of round() builtins with the same prototype as in C, so there is not a problem.
OK to commit and close PR43040?
FX
2010-06-09 Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43040
* f95-lang.c (gfc_init_builtin_functions): Remove comment.
Index: f95-lang.c
===================================================================
--- f95-lang.c (revision 160457)
+++ f95-lang.c (working copy)
@@ -755,8 +755,6 @@ gfc_init_builtin_functions (void)
#include "mathbuiltins.def"
- /* We define these separately as the fortran versions have different
- semantics (they return an integer type) */
gfc_define_builtin ("__builtin_roundl", mfunc_longdouble[0],
BUILT_IN_ROUNDL, "roundl", true);
gfc_define_builtin ("__builtin_round", mfunc_double[0],