This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [patch, fortran] PR43832 OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
- From: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
- To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:59:30 +0300
- Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR43832 OPEN statement not diagnosing missing unit number
- References: <4BD256E2.8080606@verizon.net> <4BD25BBA.70904@verizon.net>
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 05:47, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@verizon.net> wrote:
> Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The attached patch adds an error message. I also found a redundant and bad
>> test case fgetc_3.f90 that failed with this patch and so I deleted it and
>> added the new test case open_nounit.f90.
>
> Disregard the fgetc_3.f90 missing. My local trunk was at r158397. ?Otherwise
> all is identical.
Ok for trunk.
I'm a bit surprised that we have missed such an obvious restriction for so long.
--
Janne Blomqvist