Re: merging of trunk to fortran-dev?

[Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

>> although Daniel's constructor patch presently seems to have no overlap
>> with the OOP stuff on the fortran-dev branch, it may not be the
>> optimal solution to have them both on the same branch.
>>
>> We still have the fortran-experiments branch, don't we? It seems this
>> hasn't been used for about two years, so we could just update it to
>> current trunk and put Daniel's constructor work there. Or is there any
>> reason why we can/should not do that?
>
> The old fortran-experiments branch was/is severely messed-up.
> It may be painful to bring it up to date.

Ok, I didn't know that. I proposed this because I thought it would be easy.

Also I won't oppose the fortran-dev plan if all other alternatives
turn out to be more inconvenient.

Cheers,
Janus