This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Performance regression 4.3 vs 4.4/4.5

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: tprince at computer dot org
Cc: salvatore dot filippone at uniroma2 dot it, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:32:44 +0100
Subject: Re: Performance regression 4.3 vs 4.4/4.5
References: <1258625954.2909.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1258639649.7614.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4B055361.3040509@aol.com>

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Tim Prince <n8tm@aol.com> wrote:
> Salvatore Filippone wrote:
>>
>> To expand on my previous message, I have built a self contained test
>> demonstrating the problem.
>
> Do you get similar results if you use a sane method to obtain the operands,
> particular if you try the same data in each case?

If so please file a bugreport.

Richard.

References:
- Performance regression 4.3 vs 4.4/4.5
  - From: Salvatore Filippone
- Re: Performance regression 4.3 vs 4.4/4.5
  - From: Salvatore Filippone
- Re: Performance regression 4.3 vs 4.4/4.5
  - From: Tim Prince

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]