This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] PR41909 [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE with "call foo" in "program foo"

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
Cc: gfortran list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:20:53 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR41909 [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE with "call foo" in "program foo"
References: <4AF3A5C8.60902@verizon.net> <4AF3DF78.3060303@gmail.com>

On 11/06/2009 12:34 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:

Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi Folks,

This simple patch avoids the assertion that is giving the ICE.

Regression tested on x86-64.

With the patch, the test case in the PR gives:
$ gfc pr41909.f90
pr41909.f90:3.13:
call test()
1
pr41909.f90:1.12:
program test
2
Error: Global name 'test' at (1) is already being used as a PROGRAM at
(2)
OK for trunk?
Ok, provided you also commit a changelog entry and a testcase for the
testsuite.
Does the same patch also apply to 4.4 and gets rid of the ICE? It seems
a backport is in order.

Yes I will do a ChangeLog and test case. I will check 4.4 and see what happens.

Jerry

References:
- [patch, fortran] PR41909 [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE with "call foo" in "program foo"
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch, fortran] PR41909 [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE with "call foo" in "program foo"
  - From: Janne Blomqvist

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]