This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] fortran/41918 -- silence a warning

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:45:44 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran/41918 -- silence a warning
References: <20091103230148.GA19411@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <7b446c2e0911031513v30d2d139k731ace78b40ac2d9@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:13:07AM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 01:01, Steve Kargl
> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > The patch has been built and regtested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
> > There are no regression. ?I'm not sure if this will silence
> > all possible warnings where a default initialization can
> > occur, but it catches those in my tet program.
> >
> > 2009-11-03 ?Steven G. Kargl ?<kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > ? PR fortran/41918
> > ? * fortran/trans-decl.c: Silence intent(out) warning for derived type
> > ? dummy arguments with default initialization.
> >
> >
> 
> Ok.
> 

Thanks, Janne.

I'll give Tobias a day or so to respond.  In c.l.f. or bugzilla,
he hinted that a similar spurious warning may be issues with 
(allocatable?) procedure pointers.  I haven't started to use
procpointers, so can't dream up a test program.

-- 
Steve

References:
- [PATCH] fortran/41918 -- silence a warning
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH] fortran/41918 -- silence a warning
  - From: Janne Blomqvist

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]