This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: erroneous warning about line truncation


Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:47:03AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:03:10AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
Folks,

I get warnings about line truncation on fixed-form (f77) code when I have inline comments starting at column 73 and beyond.

Fixed-form code is restricted to 72 columns.  From the Fortran
2003 Standard.

3.3.2 Fixed source form

In fixed source form, there are restrictions on where a statement mayr
appear within a line.  If a source line contains only default kind
characters, it shall contain exactly 72 characters; otherwise, its
maximum number of characters is processor dependent.

See the gfortran manual for options that allows you to violate this
restricton.

Steve,

line 5 in the mock code I posted emits a warning, while line 4 doesn't.
Both lines are more than 72 chars in length.

subroutine foo
IMPLICIT NONE
Integer stupid_dummy_variable1 ! stupid_dummy_variable1
Integer stupid_dummy_variable2 ! stupid_dummy_variable2
Integer stupid_dummy_variable3 ! stupid_dummy_variable3

Actually, after I unwrap the two comments (email programs have a funny habit of wrapping long lines). Neither gives a warning. Of course, I simply unwrapped the lines. You've obviously done something more with the above example; perhaps, starting the two comments in column 73. Let's see.

troutmask:sgk[208] nedit fh.f  (unfix to column 73)
troutmask:sgk[207] gfc4x -c -Wall fh.f
fh.f:4.72:

Integer stupid_dummy_variable2 1
Warning: Line truncated at (1)
fh.f:5.72:


Integer stupid_dummy_variable3 1
Warning: Line truncated at (1)


Yep, the lines of turncated. RTFM.

troutmask:sgk[216] gfc4x -c -Wall -ffixed-line-length-none fh.f

To re-iterate, fixed-form is restricted to 72 columns. Period.


Steve,


may be I try one more time, this time by attaching the source.
line 5 emits warning, line 4 not - both lines are longer than 72 chars if the comments are taken into consideration. the actual statements (decls. of stupid_dummy_variable2,3) both end at column 36.


I guess it'll come down to religious interpretation of the standard document (which I don't have access to) whether inline comments are part of statements or not.

H.
      subroutine foo
      IMPLICIT NONE
      Integer stupid_dummy_variable1 ! stupid_dummy_variable1
      Integer stupid_dummy_variable2                                   ! stupid_dummy_variable2
      Integer stupid_dummy_variable3                                    ! stupid_dummy_variable3

      write(*,*) stupid_dummy_variable1,
     &           stupid_dummy_variable2,
     &           stupid_dummy_variable3

      end

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]