fortran archive
date index for August, 2009

This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2009
23:20 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Dave Korn
22:40 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Steve Kargl
22:22 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Steve Kargl
21:58 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Steve Kargl
19:16 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
16:56 Re: an ICE with allocate ? Steve Kargl
16:50 Re: an ICE with allocate ? jdelia
16:47 Re: an ICE with allocate ? Steve Kargl
16:34 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
15:45 Re: an ICE with allocate ? Janus Weil
15:43 Re: an ICE with allocate ? jdelia
15:30 Re: an ICE with allocate ? Steve Kargl
10:31 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
10:09 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Daniel Kraft
09:55 an ICE with allocate ? jdelia
09:53 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
09:38 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Paul Richard Thomas
06:41 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Daniel Kraft
06:00 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Tobias Burnus
04:33 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Steve Kargl
04:26 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Steve Kargl
01:53 Re: Is this code OK? Bud Davis
01:42 Re: [PATCH Take 2]: Fix two fortran testcases when using -fpic/-fPIC Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:25 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Steve Kargl

August 30, 2009
23:05 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
19:58 Re: ALLOCATABLE actual argument and the need for an explicit interface. Toon Moene
19:27 Re: ALLOCATABLE actual argument and the need for an explicit interface. Tobias Schlüter
19:15 ALLOCATABLE actual argument and the need for an explicit interface. Toon Moene
17:14 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Daniel Kraft
16:40 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
16:13 Re: [patch, libfortran] Use functon for counting true values Steve Kargl
16:03 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Steve Kargl
15:45 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Salvatore Filippone
15:00 Re: namelist query on comp.lang.fortran Jerry DeLisle
11:00 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
09:56 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
09:50 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
09:32 Re: [patch, libfortran] Use functon for counting true values Thomas Koenig
08:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
08:22 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Paul Richard Thomas
08:12 namelist query on comp.lang.fortran Paul Richard Thomas
07:57 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
07:39 Re: [patch, fortran] PR39229 No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows Daniel Kraft
01:41 Re: [patch, fortran] PR39229 No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows Jerry DeLisle

August 29, 2009
19:41 Re: [patch, libfortran] Use functon for counting true values Steve Kargl
19:36 [patch, libfortran] Use functon for counting true values Thomas Koenig
19:07 [Patch, Fortran] Correct a comment. Steve Kargl
18:54 Re: [PATCH Take 2]: Fix two fortran testcases when using -fpic/-fPIC Steve Kargl
18:45 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Steve Kargl
18:15 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40996: Allocatable Scalars Janus Weil
15:41 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
12:16 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Thomas Koenig
10:03 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
08:51 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Janne Blomqvist
08:21 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
08:10 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas

August 28, 2009
22:51 [patch, fortran] PR39229 No warning of truncated lines if a continuation line follows Jerry DeLisle
21:43 Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Jerry DeLisle
21:34 [PATCH, Fortran] Re-fix PR 31292 Steve Kargl
19:24 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Steve Kargl
13:29 [PATCH Take 2]: Fix two fortran testcases when using -fpic/-fPIC Kaveh R. GHAZI
10:23 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Tobias Burnus
10:17 Re: Is this code OK? Tobias Burnus
10:14 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
10:06 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
10:04 Re: [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
08:30 [Patch, Fortran, Doc] Document type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
00:35 Is this code OK? Bud Davis

August 27, 2009
20:25 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Janus Weil
20:16 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
19:52 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Janus Weil
19:25 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Daniel Kraft
18:47 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Janus Weil
17:54 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 39667 cleanup use of temp files testsuite Janne Blomqvist
17:40 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Daniel Kraft
17:31 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Janus Weil
17:27 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Steve Kargl
17:16 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
14:54 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 39667 cleanup use of temp files testsuite Daniel Kraft
14:11 Re: fmt_with_extra.f failure Steve Kargl
14:02 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Daniel Kraft
12:04 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
12:03 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR 2839 - xfail fmt_with_extra.f as patch was reverted Tobias Burnus
11:50 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
11:16 fmt_with_extra.f failure Daniel Kraft
09:11 Пора исполнить песню лета www
07:48 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Tobias Burnus

August 26, 2009
08:01 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
07:42 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Dominique Dhumieres
02:19 Reverted fix for PR28093 Bud Davis

August 25, 2009
22:15 [Patch, fortran] PR 39667 cleanup use of temp files testsuite Janne Blomqvist
21:26 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40869: PPC assignment checking Janus Weil
20:45 [PATCH, fortran] Remove SVN merge marker Michael Meissner
20:42 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
20:32 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Richard Henderson
20:16 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
18:26 [Patch, fortran] Committed, documentation bugfix Janne Blomqvist
15:32 Re: [PATCH v2, alpha]: Fix gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 failure Richard Henderson
15:08 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Dominique Dhumieres
14:56 Re: undefined reference to `MAIN__' Tobias Burnus
14:40 Re: {PATCH]: Fix two fortran testcases when using -fpic/-fPIC Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:37 {PATCH]: Fix two fortran testcases when using -fpic/-fPIC Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 41139: a procedure pointer call as actual argument Janus Weil
14:16 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
13:20 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
13:17 Re: undefined reference to `MAIN__' Tim Prince
12:53 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Dominique Dhumieres
12:48 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
11:49 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Dominique Dhumieres
11:41 Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 41139: a procedure pointer call as actual argument Janus Weil
10:53 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
10:32 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Dominique Dhumieres
06:38 Re: undefined reference to `MAIN__' Tobias Burnus
05:21 [patch,fortran] [4.5 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Jerry DeLisle
05:04 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Paul Richard Thomas
04:59 undefined reference to `MAIN__' chao sun
02:12 Re: Broken format statements Jerry DeLisle
02:08 Broken format statements Bud Davis
01:09 [patch, fortran] PR41154 [4.5 Regression] Comma required after P descriptor Jerry DeLisle

August 24, 2009
22:51 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR fortran/41157 -- dtime gives inconsistent results. Tobias Schlüter
21:55 Re: [fortran] PR40660: fix FE location problem Tobias Schlüter
21:45 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Tobias Schlüter
21:33 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
21:07 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Steven Bosscher
20:48 [PATCH] Fix PR fortran/41157 -- dtime gives inconsistent results. Steve Kargl
20:36 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
20:36 Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
20:29 [PATCH] PR fortran/31593: Speed up loops with DO variables as procedure arguments Tobias Schlüter
18:33 [fortran] PR40660: fix FE location problem Aldy Hernandez
18:09 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
17:29 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
17:11 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
16:59 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
12:20 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
07:31 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
04:46 Re: [patch, fortran] PR35754 -std=f95: Reject "1P2E12.4" w/o a comma after the "P" Jerry DeLisle
02:42 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince

August 23, 2009
22:29 Re: no g77 in gcc-4.3.3 (within ubuntu) Bud Davis
21:27 Re: no g77 in gcc-4.3.3 (within ubuntu) Paul Richard Thomas
21:12 Re: no g77 in gcc-4.3.3 (within ubuntu) Steve Kargl
21:09 Re: no g77 in gcc-4.3.3 (within ubuntu) Janus Weil
20:49 no g77 in gcc-4.3.3 (within ubuntu) Diego Guadagnoli
19:36 Re: [patch, fortran] PR35754 -std=f95: Reject "1P2E12.4" w/o a comma after the "P" Steve Kargl
19:34 Re: [patch, fortran] PR35754 -std=f95: Reject "1P2E12.4" w/o a comma after the "P" Tobias Burnus
19:18 [patch, fortran] PR35754 -std=f95: Reject "1P2E12.4" w/o a comma after the "P" Jerry DeLisle
19:14 [Fortran, committed] Fix licenses in libgfortran Steve Kargl
18:14 [PATCH, Fortran] Fix ChangeLog Steve Kargl
17:57 [PATCH, Fortran, committed] document F2003 [de]allocate is implemented. Steve Kargl
15:50 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
15:42 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
15:35 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
14:55 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
14:47 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
14:06 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
09:59 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
09:41 [FWD] an analysis of gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 FAILs Dominique Dhumieres
09:28 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 IainS
08:21 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Tobias Burnus
08:01 Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 41139: a procedure pointer call as actual argument Paul Richard Thomas
05:00 Re: PPC ICE Steve Kargl
03:21 Re: [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Steve Kargl
00:26 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
00:26 Re: [patch,fortran] PR28093 warn for extra characters in format string Jerry DeLisle

August 22, 2009
23:20 Re: [patch,fortran] PR28093 warn for extra characters in format string Bud Davis
23:18 [patch,fortran] PR28093 warn for extra characters in format string Bud Davis
22:00 Re: [patch, fortran] PR37446 Diagnostic of edit descriptors, esp. EN Dominique Dhumieres
21:25 Re: [patch, libfortran] Bounds checking for unpack Jerry DeLisle
21:11 Re: [patch, fortran] PR37446 Diagnostic of edit descriptors, esp. EN Jerry DeLisle
20:44 Re: [patch, fortran] PR37746 Diagnostic of edit descriptors, esp. EN Tobias Burnus
20:27 [patch, fortran] PR37746 Diagnostic of edit descriptors, esp. EN Jerry DeLisle
19:47 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
15:12 Re: [Patch,fortran] PR 27740 Symbol versioning for libgfortran Janne Blomqvist
14:56 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Steve Kargl
14:21 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Tim Prince
12:11 [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 41139: a procedure pointer call as actual argument Janus Weil
11:34 [PATCH v2, alpha]: Fix gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 failure Uros Bizjak
09:51 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 N.M. Maclaren
09:20 Possible typo in gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/whole_file_[56].f90 Dominique Dhumieres

August 21, 2009
22:18 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Richard Henderson
21:47 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Uros Bizjak
21:15 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Richard Henderson
20:29 [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not load denormals in gfortran.fortran_torture/intrinsic_nearest.f90 Uros Bizjak
17:09 Re: [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not generate denormals in gfortran.dg/boz_9.f90 Tobias Burnus
16:20 [PATCH, gfortran testsuite]: Do not generate denormals in gfortran.dg/boz_9.f90 Uros Bizjak
09:44 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41106: Procedure Pointers with CHARACTER results Janus Weil
08:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41106: Procedure Pointers with CHARACTER results Janus Weil
07:52 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41106: Procedure Pointers with CHARACTER results Tobias Burnus

August 20, 2009
23:59 Re: Ping: Tweak common_5.f and common_align_2.f90 for sh Steve Kargl
23:27 Ping: Tweak common_5.f and common_align_2.f90 for sh Kaz Kojima
20:17 [patch, libfortran,committed] Fix PR 40962 Thomas Koenig
19:04 Re: [PATCH] Add some missing folding in gfc_trans_do Tobias Schlüter
18:46 [PATCH] Add some missing folding in gfc_trans_do Tobias Schlüter
18:42 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41106: Procedure Pointers with CHARACTER results Janus Weil
16:49 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41106: Procedure Pointers with CHARACTER results Janus Weil
14:20 Re: Fix PR41126 Steve Kargl
14:17 Fix PR41126 Michael Matz
09:35 Re: possible problem with handling IMPLICIT statement Krishna Myneni
09:10 Re: PPC ICE Janus Weil
08:57 Re: PPC ICE Dominique Dhumieres
08:03 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types N.M. Maclaren
07:59 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
07:22 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Paolo Bonzini
05:30 Re: possible problem with handling IMPLICIT statement Steve Kargl
05:20 Re: possible problem with handling IMPLICIT statement Steve Kargl
05:11 Re: possible problem with handling IMPLICIT statement Jerry DeLisle
04:20 possible problem with handling IMPLICIT statement Krishna Myneni

August 19, 2009
19:10 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
18:00 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
17:56 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
17:06 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types N.M. Maclaren
16:54 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
16:43 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
14:59 Re: problem building BLAS and LAPACK with -fimplicit-none Janus Weil
14:57 Re: problem building BLAS and LAPACK with -fimplicit-none Janus Weil
14:45 problem building BLAS and LAPACK with -fimplicit-none Barron Bichon
14:40 Re: PPC ICE Steve Kargl
14:12 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
14:06 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
13:36 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types N.M. Maclaren
13:15 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
13:01 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
12:59 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Richard Guenther
12:47 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
12:36 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
11:45 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
10:44 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
10:25 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
09:07 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
09:01 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types N.M. Maclaren
08:30 Re: PPC ICE Janus Weil
08:29 Indexing of sections/array function returns Paul Keir
05:55 Re: PPC ICE Steve Kargl
01:02 warnings in resolve.c Steve Kargl
01:01 Re: PPC ICE Steve Kargl
00:45 PPC ICE Steve Kargl

August 18, 2009
21:08 [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37425: Finish type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
19:38 Re: license question Tobias Burnus
19:23 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
18:05 Re: license question Steve Kargl
17:51 license question M. Reuter
17:31 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
16:33 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
16:13 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
16:07 Re: [patch,libgomp] PR 41102: Make omp_lib.h.in -std=f95 conform Jakub Jelinek
16:02 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
15:47 [patch,libgomp] PR 41102: Make omp_lib.h.in -std=f95 conform Tobias Burnus
15:41 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
15:20 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Richard Guenther
15:17 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
15:14 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Steve Kargl
14:55 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
14:43 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Dominique Dhumieres
14:40 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
14:37 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
13:47 Re: Array Descriptor Update N.M. Maclaren
13:29 Re: Undefined symbols for static gfortran on Mac David Rawlins
13:04 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Tobias Burnus
12:53 Re: [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Paul Richard Thomas
12:24 Re: Array Descriptor Update Richard Guenther
12:13 Array Descriptor Update N.M. Maclaren
12:11 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
12:09 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
10:51 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Dominique Dhumieres
09:07 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Richard Guenther
08:49 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] Fortran update for gcc-4.5/changes.html Tobias Burnus
08:13 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] Fortran update for gcc-4.5/changes.html Dennis Wassel
07:27 Re: [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Tobias Burnus
07:15 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Tobias Burnus
06:29 Re: [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Steve Kargl
04:58 Re: [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Paul Richard Thomas

August 17, 2009
22:56 Re: Undefined symbols for static gfortran on Mac IainS
22:55 Re: Undefined symbols for static gfortran on Mac Janne Blomqvist
22:48 Undefined symbols for static gfortran on Mac David Rawlins
21:33 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Tobias Burnus
20:23 [Patch, fortran] PR41062 - [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438 Paul Richard Thomas
20:00 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] Fortran update for gcc-4.5/changes.html Janus Weil
18:57 Re: PING: [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS Daniel Kraft
18:22 Re: [patch, libfortran] Bounds checking for unpack Thomas Koenig
17:14 Re: [PATCH 2/N] LIBTOOLFLAGS, and *_LINK fixes for Automake 1.11 Benjamin Kosnik
16:55 Re: RFA: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
16:27 RFA: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
15:42 [Patch,wwwdocs] Fortran update for gcc-4.5/changes.html Tobias Burnus
14:50 Re: [patch, fortran] PR41075 Add unlimited format item [F2008] Jerry DeLisle
14:47 Re: PING: [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS Jerry DeLisle
13:41 Re: RFC: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
12:54 Re: RFC: Revamp fortran array types Dominique Dhumieres
12:52 PING: [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS Daniel Kraft
12:21 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? N.M. Maclaren
12:01 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Michael Matz
10:36 Re: Learn Fortran 77 N.M. Maclaren
09:13 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40877: memory leaks with gfc_charlen Janus Weil
07:27 Re: [patch, fortran] PR41075 Add unlimited format item [F2008] Tobias Burnus
05:56 [PATCH] Implementation for ALLOCATE(..., SOURCE=expression) Steve Kargl
03:49 [patch, fortran] PR41075 Add unlimited format item [F2008] Jerry DeLisle

August 16, 2009
23:57 Re: Learn Fortran 77 bladu
22:15 Re: [PATCH] Fix hack in trans-expr.c Jerry DeLisle
20:55 Re: Learn Fortran 77 Tobias Burnus
20:37 Re: [patch, libfortran] Bounds checking for unpack Toon Moene
20:34 Re: Learn Fortran 77 bladu
20:33 Re: Learn Fortran 77 bladu
20:22 Re: Learn Fortran 77 Steve Kargl
20:14 Learn Fortran 77 bladu
20:11 Re: RFC: GCC$ ATTRIBUTE for intrinsic procedures Steve Kargl
20:02 [PATCH] Fix hack in trans-expr.c Richard Guenther
20:02 RFC: GCC$ ATTRIBUTE for intrinsic procedures Tobias Burnus
19:57 Re: RFC: Revamp fortran array types Toon Moene
14:41 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
14:20 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40877: memory leaks with gfc_charlen Jerry DeLisle
13:21 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
13:08 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
11:45 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
11:38 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
10:47 Re: [PATCH] Fortran/PR31593 Speed up some loops Tobias SchlÃÂter
08:22 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40877: memory leaks with gfc_charlen Janus Weil
08:05 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Thomas Koenig

August 15, 2009
22:15 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
20:59 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR41080: fix -dumpversion Tobias Burnus
20:56 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR 41080 - fix -dumpversion Tobias Burnus
20:35 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
20:30 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Thomas Koenig
20:07 Re: [PATCH] Fortran/PR31593 Speed up some loops Tobias Schlüter
19:17 Re: [PATCH] Fortran/PR31593 Speed up some loops Jack Howarth
18:51 Re: [PATCH] Fortran/PR31593 Speed up some loops Tobias Schlüter
18:49 [PATCH] Fortran/PR31593 Speed up some loops Tobias Schlüter
16:55 Re: [PATCH 2/N] LIBTOOLFLAGS, and *_LINK fixes for Automake 1.11 Paolo Bonzini
16:27 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
16:13 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Thomas Koenig
12:43 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? N.M. Maclaren
11:54 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
11:39 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
11:32 [PATCH 2/N] LIBTOOLFLAGS, and *_LINK fixes for Automake 1.11 Ralf Wildenhues
11:32 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? N.M. Maclaren
11:20 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
11:11 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Thomas Koenig
10:53 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
10:12 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
09:49 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Thomas Koenig
09:46 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Richard Guenther
08:49 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
07:56 Re: How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Janne Blomqvist

August 14, 2009
23:59 How to express the fact that arguments don't escape? Tobias Schlüter
22:07 [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression, Committed] PR 41070: Error: Components of structure constructor '' at (1) are PRIVATE Janus Weil
19:31 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Kai Tietz
19:02 [patch, libgfortran]: PR32784 Provide CONIO support for mingw Jerry DeLisle
18:43 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Tobias Burnus
17:59 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR40863 [4.5 Regression] Build failure in libgfortran Janne Blomqvist
17:10 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Kai Tietz
09:34 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
05:12 [Fortran, committed] Whitespace fix in decl.c Steve Kargl
00:17 Re: [Fortran,testcase] Testcase for Win API call Jerry DeLisle

August 13, 2009
19:56 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40941: gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union Janus Weil
18:35 [patch, libfortran] Bounds checking for unpack Thomas Koenig
12:35 Re: [Fortran,testcase] Testcase for Win API call Dennis Wassel
12:30 Re: [Fortran,testcase] Testcase for Win API call Jerry DeLisle
11:39 [Fortran,testcase] Testcase for Win API call Dennis Wassel
11:21 Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 40995: Spurious "Type specified for intrinsic function...ignored" message Janus Weil
11:07 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40941: gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union Janus Weil
10:36 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40941: gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union Paul Richard Thomas
09:33 Re: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 40995: Spurious "Type specified for intrinsic function...ignored" message Tobias Burnus
08:58 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40941: gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union Janus Weil

August 12, 2009
15:42 Re: Experimental hacking of gfortran N.M. Maclaren
14:50 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Tobias Burnus
14:28 Re: Experimental hacking of gfortran Tobias Burnus
13:43 Re: [PATCH] Remove types_compatible_p langhook use from the middle-end Richard Guenther
13:17 Re: [PATCH] Remove types_compatible_p langhook use from the middle-end Diego Novillo
12:56 Experimental hacking of gfortran N.M. Maclaren
11:08 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Joseph S. Myers
10:07 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Kai Tietz
09:54 Re: [patch gfortran]: Fix warning for w64 reasoned by pointer cast Tobias Burnus
09:05 [Fortran,Patch,committed] PR 41034 [4.5 Regression] Wrongly rejected proc pointer assignment with CDECL (compiler-directive_1.f90) Tobias Burnus
08:39 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Tobias Burnus
08:11 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? N.M. Maclaren
03:00 Re: Fwd: Precompiled gfortran on Linux - libmpfr problem Jerry DeLisle

August 11, 2009
21:23 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Steve Kargl
21:12 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Tobias Schlüter
21:09 RE: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC N
21:09 RE: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC N
20:56 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Steve Kargl
20:49 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Tobias Schlüter
20:40 RE: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC N
20:39 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Steve Kargl
20:26 Re: Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Tobias Schlüter
20:20 Getting equivalent 'double' parsing in c++ and fortran? Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC N
20:13 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41022: procedure pointer components as actual arguments Janus Weil
15:54 RFC: Revamp fortran array types Michael Matz
15:24 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41022: procedure pointer components as actual arguments Tobias Burnus
15:21 Re: [PATCH] Remove types_compatible_p langhook use from the middle-end Tobias Burnus
14:59 [PATCH] Remove types_compatible_p langhook use from the middle-end Richard Guenther
12:43 Re: Fwd: Precompiled gfortran on Linux - libmpfr problem Jerry DeLisle
12:09 [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS Daniel Kraft
08:43 Re: Unexpected Failures due to stdcall junk Janus Weil
08:20 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 41022: procedure pointer components as actual arguments Janus Weil

August 10, 2009
20:55 Re: What happens when you --enable libgomp but not --enable-languages=fortran? Ralf Wildenhues
20:43 Unexpected Failures due to stdcall junk Steve Kargl
11:21 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Parsing and checking of type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
11:07 RFC: PR 22552 and PR 39171 Daniel Kraft
10:54 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Parsing and checking of type-bound operators Daniel Kraft
09:28 Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Dennis Wassel
09:27 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Janus Weil
07:58 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Tobias Burnus
07:38 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Tobias Burnus
07:30 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Parsing and checking of type-bound operators Tobias Burnus
06:07 Fwd: Precompiled gfortran on Linux - libmpfr problem FX

August 09, 2009
17:51 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Dave Korn
17:00 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL FX
16:40 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Dave Korn
11:02 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL FX
08:39 Re: *ping* Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Tobias Burnus
08:12 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Paul Richard Thomas
02:57 Re: *ping* Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Jerry DeLisle

August 08, 2009
21:40 *ping* Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Tobias Burnus
18:07 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Daniel Kraft
17:51 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Janus Weil
13:37 [Patch, Fortran] Parsing and checking of type-bound operators Daniel Kraft

August 07, 2009
16:50 [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 Regression] PR 40995: Spurious "Type specified for intrinsic function...ignored" message Janus Weil
09:05 Re: Attempting to allocate already allocated array Dennis Wassel
07:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Tobias Burnus
06:51 Re: Empty error message with long lines Arjen Markus
06:20 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Daniel Kraft
06:06 Re: Attempting to allocate already allocated array Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
05:40 Re: Attempting to allocate already allocated array Steve Kargl
04:37 Attempting to allocate already allocated array Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
03:29 Re: Problem with Selected_Real_Kind Jerry DeLisle
03:23 Re: Empty error message with long lines Jerry DeLisle

August 06, 2009
22:20 Re: Problem with Selected_Real_Kind Daniel Franke
22:10 Re: Problem with Selected_Real_Kind Tim Prince
21:54 Problem with Selected_Real_Kind RadSurfer
21:28 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Janus Weil
21:17 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40940: CLASS statement Janus Weil
20:48 co-array fortran Bud Davis
13:11 Re: Empty error message with long lines Arjen Markus
11:11 [Patch, Fortran] PR 40877: memory leaks with gfc_charlen Janus Weil
10:34 Re: Co-Array Fortran in GNU Fortran ? Tobias Burnus
08:24 RE: Co-Array Fortran in GNU Fortran ? Sami Saarinen

August 05, 2009
21:06 Re: Co-Array Fortran in GNU Fortran ? Tobias Burnus
20:58 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR40949 - Fix gfc_get_function_type to fix -flto failure Tobias Burnus
17:11 Co-Array Fortran in GNU Fortran ? Toon Moene
16:13 [Patch, fortran] PR40847 - [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] segfault & bogus warning Paul Richard Thomas
12:32 Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Tobias Burnus
10:53 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Dave Korn
09:45 What happens when you --enable libgomp but not --enable-languages=fortran? Dave Korn
08:51 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil

August 04, 2009
22:08 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR40949 - Fix gfc_get_function_type to fix -flto failure Richard Guenther
19:23 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Steve Kargl
17:19 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR40949 - Fix gfc_get_function_type to fix -flto failure Steven Bosscher
16:44 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR40949 - Fix gfc_get_function_type to fix -flto failure Daniel Kraft
16:35 [Patch,Fortran] PR40949 - Fix gfc_get_function_type to fix -flto failure Tobias Burnus
14:23 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Paul Richard Thomas
13:38 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Dave Korn
13:17 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
13:14 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Tim Prince
12:54 [Patch, fortran] PR40875 - ICE with illegal type conversion Paul Richard Thomas
12:53 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Paul Richard Thomas
12:02 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
11:16 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
09:57 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Daniel Franke
09:54 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Dave Korn
09:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Paul Richard Thomas
08:49 Re: [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Dennis Wassel
08:23 [Fortran,Patch] PR40955 - Save ext_attr such as STDCALL to .MOD file Tobias Burnus

August 03, 2009
21:40 [patch fortran RFA] Tweak common_5.f and common_align_2.f90 for sh Kaz Kojima
20:15 [Patch, Fortran, F03] PR 40870: include formal args in backend_decl of PPCs Janus Weil
09:13 [Patch, Fortran] PR 40941: gfc_typespec: put derived, cl and interface into union Janus Weil
06:59 Re: [patch] Allow building libgfortran as a DLL Tobias Burnus
04:17 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Steve Kargl

August 02, 2009
19:28 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Manfred Schwarb
18:55 Re: Empty error message with long lines Tobias Schlüter
18:18 Re: Empty error message with long lines Jerry DeLisle
17:19 Re: Empty error message with long lines jdelia
16:52 Re: Empty error message with long lines Jerry DeLisle
16:29 Re: Empty error message with long lines Janus Weil
15:44 Empty error message with long lines Arjen Markus
14:05 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Manfred Schwarb
14:00 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Janus Weil
13:30 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Tim Prince
13:00 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Manfred Schwarb
11:01 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Janus Weil
09:43 Re: [patch,;ibgfortran] PR40853 I/O: Namelist read error Janne Blomqvist

August 01, 2009
21:56 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Robert Dewar
21:47 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Steven Bosscher
20:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Robert Dewar
20:15 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Toon Moene
18:14 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Janus Weil
17:15 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Robert Dewar
17:12 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Daniel Kraft
16:58 [Patch, Fortran] PR 40881: warn for obsolescent features Janus Weil
13:59 Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR40853 I/O: Namelist read error Jerry DeLisle
13:54 [patch,;ibgfortran] PR40853 I/O: Namelist read error Jerry DeLisle
13:50 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40011 - Problems with -fwhole-file Paul Richard Thomas

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3