This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Jerry,
AFAICT your patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-06/msg00233.html fixes the memory leak.
The diff between my 4.4.1 (noleak) and patched trunk is:
@@ -164,7 +169,11 @@ save_parsed_format (st_parameter_dt *dtp
free_format_data (u->format_hash_table[hash].hashed_fmt);
u->format_hash_table[hash].hashed_fmt = NULL;
- u->format_hash_table[hash].key = dtp->format;
+ if (u->format_hash_table[hash].key != NULL)
+ free_mem (u->format_hash_table[hash].key);
+ u->format_hash_table[hash].key = get_mem (dtp->format_len);
+ memcpy (u->format_hash_table[hash].key, dtp->format, dtp->format_len);
+
u->format_hash_table[hash].key_len = dtp->format_len;
u->format_hash_table[hash].hashed_fmt = dtp->u.p.fmt;
}
@@ -1209,7 +1218,8 @@ parse_format (st_parameter_dt *dtp)
free_format_hash_table (dtp->u.p.current_unit);
return;
}
- save_parsed_format (dtp); + if (!is_internal_unit (dtp)) + save_parsed_format (dtp); }
It would be interesting to understand why there is no leak with the - variant.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |