This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)

From: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:48:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)
References: <20090619221714.GA30783@net-b.de> <20090620180758.GA5044@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4A3D6E1D.9010807@net-b.de>

On Sunday 21 June 2009 01:17:49 Tobias Burnus wrote:
> The following does not work with !$OMP and !GNU$:
[snip]
>+/* Match a !GCC$ ATTRIBUTES statement of the form:
[snip]
>+@code{!GNU$ ATTRIBUTES} @var{attribute-list} @code{::} @var{variable-list}

I'm confused, code has "GCC$", but the documentation refers to "GNU$"?

Is there a particular reason to use "GNU$"/"GCC$" and not "$GNU"/"$GCC", 
similar to "$OMP"?

Thanks

	Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112)
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]