fortran archive
date index for June, 2009

This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2009
23:49 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Endless loop in internal write Jerry DeLisle
17:32 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Endless loop in internal write Thomas Koenig
17:09 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40594: [4.5 Regression] wrong-code Janus Weil
16:56 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 40594: [4.5 Regression] wrong-code Daniel Franke
16:51 [Patch, Fortran] PR 40594: [4.5 Regression] wrong-code Janus Weil
00:41 [Patch, libgfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Endless loop in internal write Jerry DeLisle
00:06 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR 40580 - add -fcheck=pointer for some actual argument checks Craig Powers

June 29, 2009
20:51 Re: [Patch,Fortran] PR 40580 - add -fcheck=pointer for some actual argument checks Paul Richard Thomas
20:40 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40551 - Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy Paul Richard Thomas
20:33 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40551 - Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy Tobias Burnus
20:30 Re: [wwwdocs] Update search.html, 4.5/changes.html (MPC, Fortran) Tobias Burnus
20:17 Re: [wwwdocs] Update search.html, 4.5/changes.html (MPC, Fortran) Gerald Pfeifer
19:57 [Patch,Fortran] PR 40580 - add -fcheck=pointer for some actual argument checks Tobias Burnus
18:23 [Patch, fortran] PR40551 - Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy Paul Richard Thomas
10:12 [wwwdocs] Update search.html, 4.5/changes.html (MPC, Fortran) Tobias Burnus

June 28, 2009
20:43 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40011 - Problems with -fwhole-file Dominique Dhumieres
18:43 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Janus Weil
18:05 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Tobias Burnus
15:56 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Steve Kargl
06:27 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Steve Kargl
06:22 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Steve Kargl

June 27, 2009
21:33 [Patch, fortran] PR40011 - Problems with -fwhole-file Paul Richard Thomas
15:34 Re: [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend Tobias Burnus
13:13 [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:10 [PATCH]: Use mpc_pow in the fortran frontend Kaveh R. GHAZI
04:25 Re: libgfortran linking problem Steve Kargl

June 26, 2009
23:00 Re: libgfortran linking problem Tim Holme
22:16 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 39997/40541 Janus Weil
22:03 Re: libgfortran linking problem Steve Kargl
21:50 libgfortran linking problem Tim Holme
21:29 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 39997/40541 Tobias Burnus
20:12 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING * Tobias Burnus
17:06 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
16:17 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Kai Tietz
15:41 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
15:36 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
14:12 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Tim Prince
13:19 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Kai Tietz
13:09 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Seiji Kachi
11:42 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Angelo Graziosi
11:20 Re: Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Dave Korn
10:47 Failure building current 4.5 snapshot on Cygwin Angelo Graziosi
09:31 [Patch, Fortran] PR 39997/40541 Janus Weil
08:21 Re: [PATCH] Fix FIXME in call handling of the alias-oracle Janus Weil

June 25, 2009
19:15 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Steve Kargl
18:29 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:09 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:59 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Steve Kargl
16:35 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Tobias Schlüter
16:32 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Dominique Dhumieres
16:22 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:18 [PATCH] Fix FIXME in call handling of the alias-oracle Richard Guenther
14:34 Re: Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Maciej Zwierzycki
14:12 Re: Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Tim Prince
14:08 Re: Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Tobias Burnus
13:59 Re: Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Maciej Zwierzycki
13:04 Re: Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Tim Prince
12:38 Is it a bug: data aligment of matrix returned by gemm Maciej Zwierzycki
08:00 Re: Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Tobias Schlüter

June 24, 2009
21:38 Fortran pow (complex ** huge) returns NaN instead of Inf ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:09 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40427: [F03] Procedure Pointer Components with OPTIONAL arguments Janus Weil
08:43 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40427: [F03] Procedure Pointer Components with OPTIONAL arguments Janus Weil

June 23, 2009
12:34 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40427: [F03] Procedure Pointer Components with OPTIONAL arguments Tobias Burnus
09:40 Delta Frost harmonicas and reedplates Doc Belcher, PhD, MBA
01:29 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Craig Powers

June 22, 2009
21:23 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Tobias Burnus
21:20 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Tobias Burnus
21:04 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 37254/39850 Janus Weil
20:38 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 37254/39850 Tobias Burnus
20:29 [Patch,Fortran,committed] PR40472/50520 - Fix SPREAD for scalar SOURCE= Tobias Burnus
19:50 [Patch, Fortran] PR 37254/39850 Janus Weil
14:44 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40472 - Simplification of spread intrinsic takes a long time H.J. Lu

June 21, 2009
23:54 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Jerry DeLisle
21:55 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Dominique Dhumieres
21:33 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Dominique Dhumieres
21:16 [Fortran-Dev] Merged trunk into branch Tobias Burnus
20:32 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Steven Bosscher
20:22 Re: Port array access macros to trunk Thomas Koenig
20:06 [patch, libfortran] PR40508 Memory Leak Jerry DeLisle
19:18 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Janus Weil
18:21 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Tobias Burnus
18:17 Re: My status and meeting Steve Kargl
17:54 My status and meeting Daniel Kraft
17:31 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40443 - Elemental procedure in generic interface incorrectly selected in preference to specific procedure Tobias Burnus
17:22 [Patch, fortran] PR40443 - Elemental procedure in generic interface incorrectly selected in preference to specific procedure Paul Richard Thomas
16:32 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Janus Weil
15:59 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Janus Weil
09:59 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Tobias Burnus
08:42 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Janus Weil
07:43 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Jakub Jelinek
07:31 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40472 - Simplification of spread intrinsic takes a long time Paul Richard Thomas
00:57 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Craig Powers

June 20, 2009
23:50 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Daniel Franke
23:18 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Tobias Burnus
22:59 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40472 - Simplification of spread intrinsic takes a long time Daniel Franke
22:39 [Patch, fortran] PR40472 - Simplification of spread intrinsic takes a long time Paul Richard Thomas
18:08 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Steve Kargl
18:02 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Tobias Burnus
16:58 [Patch, Fortran] PR39850: Too strict checking for procedures as actual argument Janus Weil
11:24 Port array access macros to trunk Thomas Koenig

June 19, 2009
23:58 Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Steve Kargl
22:17 [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) Tobias Burnus
22:01 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40440 - Automatic deallocation component of DT function return value Paul Richard Thomas
15:59 Re: [PATCH FORTRAN]: Use mpc_t for representing complex numbers Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:07 Re: PATCH RFA: -Wc++-compat warning about globals with anonymous type Joseph S. Myers
08:56 [Patch, fortran] PR40440 - Automatic deallocation component of DT function return value Paul Richard Thomas
08:15 [Patch, Fortran, Committed] PR 40450: [F03] procedure pointer as actual argument Janus Weil
07:40 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40427: [F03] Procedure Pointer Components with OPTIONAL arguments Janus Weil
06:14 Re: [PATCH FORTRAN]: Use mpc_t for representing complex numbers Tobias Burnus

June 18, 2009
21:05 [Fortran-Dev] Merged TRUNK into Fortran-dev Tobias Burnus
20:25 Re: PATCH RFA: -Wc++-compat warning about globals with anonymous type Steve Kargl
19:25 PATCH RFA: -Wc++-compat warning about globals with anonymous type Ian Lance Taylor
09:14 Re: Creating A .dll With Gfortran Dennis Wassel
08:12 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40451: [F03] procedure pointer assignment rejected Janus Weil

June 17, 2009
23:23 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran Tobias Burnus
22:55 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran kamaraju kusumanchi
22:38 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40451: [F03] procedure pointer assignment rejected Tobias Burnus
22:20 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran Tobias Burnus
19:45 [Patch, Fortran] PR40451: [F03] procedure pointer assignment rejected Janus Weil
19:19 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran kamaraju kusumanchi
15:31 [PATCH FORTRAN]: Use mpc_t for representing complex numbers Kaveh R. GHAZI
07:54 Re: PATCH RFA: Initialize variable Tobias SchlÃter
03:41 Re: PATCH RFA: Initialize variable Ian Lance Taylor

June 16, 2009
22:29 [Patch,Fortran] PR 40452 Fix false positive with -fcheck=bounds Tobias Burnus
20:47 Re: PATCH RFA: Initialize variable Tobias Schlüter
20:37 PATCH RFA: Initialize variable Ian Lance Taylor
09:08 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 36947/40039: Better error messages for dummy procedures and check for OPTIONAL Janus Weil
08:35 Re: Creating A .dll With Gfortran Dennis Wassel
06:13 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran Tobias Burnus
03:13 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran Steve Kargl
00:48 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran kamaraju kusumanchi

June 15, 2009
22:23 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 36947/40039: Better error messages for dummy procedures and check for OPTIONAL Tobias Burnus
21:28 [Patch,Fortran] PR 40383 false positive with -fcheck=bounds Tobias Burnus
21:14 [Fortran,committed] Merged TRUNK into Fortran-dev Tobias Burnus
20:39 [Patch, Fortran] PR40427: [F03] Procedure Pointer Components with OPTIONAL arguments Janus Weil
18:44 Re: linking files compiled with older gfortran Tobias Burnus
17:49 Re: g95 on solaris - powf Steve Kargl
17:45 g95 on solaris - powf Alison Boeckmann
13:40 Creating A .dll With Gfortran John Robinson
03:58 linking files compiled with older gfortran kamaraju kusumanchi

June 14, 2009
15:56 Re: [libgfortran,patch] Remove set_args warning Steve Kargl
15:54 Re: [libgfortran,patch] Remove set_args warning FX
15:48 Re: [libgfortran,patch] Remove set_args warning Steve Kargl
13:13 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Dave Korn
13:10 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Jerry DeLisle
12:14 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Dave Korn
09:09 [libgfortran,patch] Remove set_args warning FX
07:31 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Danny Smith
01:30 Re: [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Jerry DeLisle
00:58 [patch, libfortran] PR32784 CONIN$, CONOUT$, and CONERR$ for Cygwin and mingw Jerry DeLisle

June 12, 2009
21:15 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Code clean up patch. Steve Kargl
21:06 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Code clean up patch. Janus Weil
20:42 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40176 comment #5 Janus Weil
20:38 [PATCH, fortran] Code clean up patch. Steve Kargl
20:30 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR40176 comment #5 Steve Kargl
19:25 [Patch, Fortran] PR40176 comment #5 Janus Weil
15:48 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 36947/40039: Better error messages for dummy procedures and check for OPTIONAL Janus Weil
07:56 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Janne Blomqvist

June 11, 2009
20:29 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40402 - Problem with data statement involving structure constructors containing non-initialisation expressions Steve Kargl
20:13 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40402 - Problem with data statement involving structure constructors containing non-initialisation expressions Paul Richard Thomas
20:07 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40402 - Problem with data statement involving structure constructors containing non-initialisation expressions Paul Richard Thomas
20:03 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40402 - Problem with data statement involving structure constructors containing non-initialisation expressions Steve Kargl
20:00 [Patch, fortran] PR40402 - Problem with data statement involving structure constructors containing non-initialisation expressions Paul Richard Thomas
18:02 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Toon Moene
15:43 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
15:18 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tobias Burnus
13:46 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Thomas Koenig
12:57 [patch,libgfortran] Format caching reverted on 4.4.1 Jerry DeLisle
11:54 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
07:30 Re: [fortran,patch] Add simplifiers for ISNAN and IS_IOSTAT_{END,EOR} Paul Richard Thomas
06:29 [fortran,patch] Add simplifiers for ISNAN and IS_IOSTAT_{END,EOR} FX
02:25 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tim Prince
01:22 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tobias Schlüter

June 10, 2009
21:55 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Steve Kargl
21:37 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
21:34 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
21:23 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Steve Kargl
21:14 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
21:12 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tim Prince
20:54 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Steve Kargl
20:29 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
17:57 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tim Prince
17:33 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tobias Schlüter
17:28 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tobias Schlüter
17:24 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Steve Kargl
16:57 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
16:42 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tim Prince
16:23 Re: preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Tobias Schlüter
16:16 Re: [PATCH] Fix trunk profiledbootstrap in fortran FE Steve Kargl
15:50 Re: [PATCH] Fix trunk profiledbootstrap in fortran FE Jakub Jelinek
15:45 Re: [PATCH] Fix trunk profiledbootstrap in fortran FE Steve Kargl
15:28 preprocessor token "#" doesn't work in gfortran as in gcc, intel-fortran or sun-fortran compiler Maik Beckmann
15:26 [PATCH] Fix trunk profiledbootstrap in fortran FE Jakub Jelinek
12:42 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
12:19 Re: display character strings in fortran kamaraju kusumanchi
11:56 Re: display character strings in fortran Tobias Burnus
11:50 Re: display character strings in fortran Arjen Markus
11:43 Re: [gfortran, RFC] A few issues that need a decision kamaraju kusumanchi
11:34 display character strings in fortran kamaraju kusumanchi

June 09, 2009
18:47 Re: gomp - cost of threadprivate data access Matevz Tadel
17:13 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Thomas Koenig
13:46 [Patch,Fortran] -fcheck=bounds fix; intrinsic.texi: INT*/REAL* documentation Tobias Burnus
08:33 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Tobias Burnus
06:45 Re: Reporting uninitialised variables Arjen Markus
03:32 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Craig Powers

June 08, 2009
22:07 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
21:46 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
21:28 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Tobias Burnus
20:37 [Fortran-dev] Merged trunk into branch Tobias Burnus
20:36 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Gerald Pfeifer
19:27 Re: [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Ralf Wildenhues
19:01 [Patch,wwwdocs] 4.5 changes: MPC and Fortran Tobias Burnus
18:52 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
18:14 Re: Reporting uninitialised variables Thomas Koenig
17:39 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Tobias Burnus
15:52 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Dave Korn
12:34 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
10:19 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Tobias Burnus
09:12 Reporting uninitialised variables Arjen Markus
07:53 Re: deferred type implementation? Paul Richard Thomas

June 07, 2009
21:58 Re: [Fortran-dev] Merged trunk into branch Jerry DeLisle
21:53 Re: [Fortran-dev] Merged trunk into branch Tobias Burnus
21:14 Re: deferred type implementation? Tobias Burnus
21:05 [Fortran-dev] Merged trunk into branch Tobias Burnus
21:01 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Toon Moene
20:58 deferred type implementation? Steve Kargl
20:25 Re: [patch, libfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] changed BACKSPACE behaviour at end of file. Jerry DeLisle
20:12 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
20:00 Re: [patch, libfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] changed BACKSPACE behaviour at end of file. Janne Blomqvist
20:00 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Tobias Burnus
18:47 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Thomas Koenig
18:40 Re: [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Toon Moene
17:42 [Patch, fortran] First steps to array descriptor reform Paul Richard Thomas
17:34 [patch, fortran-dev] PR29962 - simplifiers for SPREAD and UNPACK Tobias Burnus
16:35 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR29962 - more simplifiers for transformational intrinsics Tobias Burnus
13:50 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] Further Fortran-Dev -> Trunk merges Tobias Burnus
11:57 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR29962 - add simplifier for dot_product, matmul, transpose (F2003) Tobias Burnus
09:25 Re: [patch, libfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] changed BACKSPACE behaviour at end of file. Tobias Burnus
08:52 Re: [patch, fortran] PR40008 F2008: Add NEWUNIT= for OPEN statement Tobias Burnus
03:53 Re: [patch, fortran] PR40008 F2008: Add NEWUNIT= for OPEN statement Jerry DeLisle

June 06, 2009
21:15 Re: [Patch,Fortran,committed] PR37203: additional checks for RESHAPE Tobias Burnus
20:55 Re: [Patch,Fortran,committed] PR37203: additional checks for RESHAPE Daniel Franke
18:58 [Patch,Fortran,Committed] PR32890 - add simplifier and argument check for PACK Tobias Burnus
17:22 [patch, libfortran] [4.4/4.5 Regression] changed BACKSPACE behaviour at end of file. Jerry DeLisle
16:37 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Dominique Dhumieres

June 05, 2009
16:23 [MPC PATCH INSTALLED]: Use mpc_realref/mpc_imagref instead of MPC_RE/MPC_IM Kaveh R. GHAZI
05:31 Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta, trunk?, fortran] fix -g/-g0 codegen diffs in fortran Alexandre Oliva

June 04, 2009
23:58 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Jerry DeLisle
21:57 [Patch,Fortran,committed] PR37203: additional checks for RESHAPE Tobias Burnus
19:52 Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta, trunk?, fortran] fix -g/-g0 codegen diffs in fortran Tobias Burnus
18:57 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Tobias Burnus
16:30 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Paolo Bonzini
16:10 [Patch, libgfortran] Better format hash function Janne Blomqvist
15:41 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Craig Powers
10:56 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Richard Guenther
10:24 Re: Invalid free after last statement Dennis Wassel
09:50 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Richard Guenther
09:30 Invalid free after last statement Dennis Wassel
09:03 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Paul Richard Thomas
00:06 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40330 Fix use of saved format strings Jerry DeLisle

June 03, 2009
22:28 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Daniel Franke
22:18 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Steve Kargl
22:00 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types John McFarland
21:09 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40330 Fix use of saved format strings Janne Blomqvist
20:56 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Tobias Burnus
20:53 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Dennis Wassel
20:52 Re: *PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran] Replace intmax_type_node by INTMAX_TYPE Tobias Burnus
20:51 Re: [fortran,patch] Fix LEADZ/TRAILZ Tobias Burnus
20:49 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Tobias Burnus
20:26 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types John McFarland
20:02 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Steve Kargl
19:18 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40330 Fix use of saved format strings Janne Blomqvist
19:08 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types John McFarland
19:01 [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40330 Fix use of saved format strings Janne Blomqvist
17:27 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Tobias Burnus
16:32 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types John McFarland
15:47 Re: Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types Dennis Wassel
14:41 Bind(c) for procedures with complicated derived types John McFarland
13:42 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Tim Prince
11:36 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Dennis Wassel
10:36 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Tobias Burnus
10:26 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Richard Guenther
10:02 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Dennis Wassel
03:38 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Andrew Pinski
03:23 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Tobias Schlüter

June 02, 2009
21:20 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Tobias Burnus
21:16 *PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran] Replace intmax_type_node by INTMAX_TYPE Tobias Burnus
21:00 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Tobias SchlÃter
20:40 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Andrew Pinski
19:20 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Paul Richard Thomas
08:08 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Craig Powers
05:31 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Paul Richard Thomas

June 01, 2009
21:59 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Tobias Burnus
20:21 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Steve Kargl
19:49 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Janis Johnson
19:28 Re: PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Paul Richard Thomas
19:03 PR40011 -fwhole-file problems Paul Richard Thomas
18:14 Re: Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Steve Kargl
17:59 Fortran-related libgomp failures in case of -fno-openmp Gerald Pfeifer
16:12 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Craig Powers
15:58 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Craig Powers
10:46 Re: [PATCH]: Integrate gfortran with MPC Dominique Dhumieres
09:06 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Dave Korn
08:31 Re: [Patch,Fortran] Update gfortran.texi for mixed-language programming Ralf Wildenhues
08:30 Re: Cygwin, gfortran and C interop Tobias Burnus
08:21 Re: [PATCH]: Integrate gfortran with MPC Dennis Wassel
08:18 [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta, trunk?, fortran] fix -g/-g0 codegen diffs in fortran Alexandre Oliva
08:12 Cygwin, gfortran and C interop Anthony Stone
07:01 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Tobias Burnus
06:27 Re: [PATCH]: Integrate gfortran with MPC Kaveh R. GHAZI
05:34 Re: gfortran vs ifort Girish Kulkarni
01:10 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available] Jerry DeLisle

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3