This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 18:32:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
References: <BBCDD4EA-4ABD-4A9F-A7C7-11798F9B64B9@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905021533070.30409@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <43074C58-66EB-4E04-951C-390734196CE2@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905021635360.30409@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <8D4A783A-F2B5-4137-9ABA-E475FE34ADDF@gmail.com>

On Sat, 2 May 2009, FX wrote:

> By the way, I see that the debate around MPC integration seems to have died a
> bit. It'd like to say that it would be a really great progress for gfortran to
> have that in, as it would enable better standard conformance at a low
> maintainability price. I think Kaveh has summarized it well: mainly, it is

It would also help a lot with one of the few remaining C99 conformance 
issues (folding of complex multiplication/division, PR 30789).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
  - From: FX
- Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
  - From: FX
- Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification
  - From: FX

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]