This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] fortran/39893 -- fix segfault caused by invalid code

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:28:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran/39893 -- fix segfault caused by invalid code
References: <20090426181511.GA93370@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200904262105.22563.franke.daniel@gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:05:22PM +0200, Daniel Franke wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 20:15:11 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > 2009-04-26  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > 	PR fortran/39893
> > 	* gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_dummy.f90: New Test.
> >
> >
> > 2009-04-26  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > 	PR fortran/39893
> > 	fortran/data.c (gfc_assign_data_value): If the lvalue is an
> > 	assumed character length entity in a data statement, then
> > 	return FAILURE to prevent segmentation fault.
> >
> > OK for trunk and 4.4?
> 
> In the testcase: s/porivided/provided
> 
> Otherwise ok.
> 

Thanks.

Committed as revision 146816.

I'll backport to 4.4 in a week.

-- 
Steve

References:
- [PATCH] fortran/39893 -- fix segfault caused by invalid code
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH] fortran/39893 -- fix segfault caused by invalid code
  - From: Daniel Franke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]