This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: poll: PRs older than three years

From: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:02:01 +0200
Subject: Re: poll: PRs older than three years
References: <200904110016.41805.franke.daniel@gmail.com> <339c37f20904131006o72a944ax60ba1c80cd9aa449@mail.gmail.com>

2009/4/13 Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> ?PR23169 - INTENT not passed on for to optimizer
>> ?The more I look into the, the more confused I am. No idea.
>
> Note comment #5
> A C equivalent test case "works". ?Once the infamous
> multiple-decls-per-function issue in gfortran is fixed, this bug probably will
> disappear.
> Does it?

I currently can not give it a try myself, but note comments #7 and #8 as well.
Thus, probably not.


>> ?PR24878 - sub. getting called as a funct. if passed as actual argument
>> ?It was stated in 2005 by Andrew that few if any other compiler catch this.
>> ?Close as WONTFIX?
>
> Does -fwhole-file detect it? ?It should... I think! (I am not in a
> position to check right now)

If nobody else beats me to it, I'll give it a try when I'm back at home.


Cheers

     Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: poll: PRs older than three years
  - From: Daniel Franke

References:
- poll: PRs older than three years
  - From: Daniel Franke
- Re: poll: PRs older than three years
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]