This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
[Patch, Fortran, 4.5] PR 39414 - PROCEDURE statement double declaration bug
- From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:26 +0100
- Subject: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5] PR 39414 - PROCEDURE statement double declaration bug
Hi all,
here is my fix for PR39414. It's regression-tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for 4.5?
Cheers,
Janus
2009-03-10 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/39414
* decl.c (match_procedure_decl): Fix double declaration problems with
PROCEDURE statements.
* symbol.c (gfc_add_type): Ditto.
2009-03-10 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/39414
* proc_decl_21.f90: New.
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c (Revision 144728)
+++ gcc/fortran/symbol.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1554,8 +1554,7 @@ gfc_add_type (gfc_symbol *sym, gfc_types
if (sym->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
{
const char *msg = "Symbol '%s' at %L already has basic type of %s";
- if (!(sym->ts.type == ts->type
- && (sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE || sym->attr.result))
+ if (!(sym->ts.type == ts->type && sym->attr.result)
|| gfc_notification_std (GFC_STD_GNU) == ERROR
|| pedantic)
{
@@ -1569,6 +1568,13 @@ gfc_add_type (gfc_symbol *sym, gfc_types
gfc_warning (msg, sym->name, where, gfc_basic_typename (sym->ts.type));
}
+ if (sym->attr.procedure && sym->ts.interface)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("Procedure '%s' at %L may not have basic type of %s", sym->name, where,
+ gfc_basic_typename (ts->type));
+ return FAILURE;
+ }
+
flavor = sym->attr.flavor;
if (flavor == FL_PROGRAM || flavor == FL_BLOCK_DATA || flavor == FL_MODULE
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (Revision 144728)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -4207,12 +4207,20 @@ got_ts:
/* Set interface. */
if (proc_if != NULL)
{
+ if (sym->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("Procedure '%s' at %L already has basic type of %s",
+ sym->name, &gfc_current_locus,
+ gfc_basic_typename (sym->ts.type));
+ return MATCH_ERROR;
+ }
sym->ts.interface = proc_if;
sym->attr.untyped = 1;
}
else if (current_ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
{
- sym->ts = current_ts;
+ if (gfc_add_type (sym, ¤t_ts, &gfc_current_locus) == FAILURE)
+ return MATCH_ERROR;
sym->ts.interface = gfc_new_symbol ("", gfc_current_ns);
sym->ts.interface->ts = current_ts;
sym->ts.interface->attr.function = 1;
! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/39414: PROCEDURE statement double declaration bug
!
! Discovered by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
! Modified by Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
! forbidden
procedure(integer) :: a
integer :: a ! { dg-error "already has basic type of" }
integer :: b
procedure(integer) :: b ! { dg-error "already has basic type of" }
procedure(iabs) :: c
integer :: c ! { dg-error "may not have basic type of" }
integer :: d
procedure(iabs) :: d ! { dg-error "already has basic type of" }
! allowed
integer :: e
procedure() :: e
procedure() :: f
integer :: f
end