This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: optimization removes a __builtin_memcpy?
- From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
- To: "Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:34:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: optimization removes a __builtin_memcpy?
- References: <20081130042805.GA64990@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <84fc9c000811300326t18f0b203oa7c9be67787ebece@mail.gmail.com> <339c37f20811301056i3e9995ffxae48867a275c2dfc@mail.gmail.com> <20081201144448.GA76960@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Steve,
> Richard's comment helped to the extent that I read through
> trans.c with a bit more care. In the end, telling someone
> with my background to look at builtins.c:fold_builtin_memory_op
> is tantamount to telling a blind person to look at a Picasso.
That's an elegant way of expressing what I was trying to say:-)
Cheers
Paul
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
--Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy