This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is there a PR open for this code?

From: Tobias Schlüter <Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:59:36 +0200
Subject: Re: Is there a PR open for this code?
References: <20080911135746.2D0783BAB9@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>

Dominique Dhumieres wrote:

Compiling the code with -Wuninitialized gives
alloc_func.f90: In function 'no_leak':
alloc_func.f90:3: warning: 'i' is used uninitialized in this function
alloc_func.f90:3: warning: 'n' is used uninitialized in this function
However I think there is a missing check that the shapes of the lhs and
rhs are the same in
x=(/(i, i=1, n)/)

which should be rejected if n /= 100.

Is there a PR open for that or should I open one?

Is this not caught by bounds-checking at runtime? I don't see how this could be done at compile-time.

Cheers,
- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a PR open for this code?
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- Re: Is there a PR open for this code?
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]