This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran] Follow-up to used-before-typed patch
- From: Daniel Kraft <d at domob dot eu>
- To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:57:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] Follow-up to used-before-typed patch
- References: <48AE84F4.70206@domob.eu> <48AE93DF.5080304@net-b.de>
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Kraft wrote:
this is a follow-up to my used-before-typed patch addressing the
problem with indexing. While implementing, I realized that I could in
fact reuse gfc_traverse_expr and rewrote the logic to do that; this
gets the index thing right and makes the code hopefully cleaner.
No regressions on GNU/Linux-x86-32 (to 99% sure, test is still running).
Daniel Kraft wrote:
So I then propose to rename it as gfc_matching_prefix and move it to
match.h, in addition to the gfc_traverse_expr patch sent. What do you
think about this?
BTW, regression test finished indeed without failures, but not much a
surprise...
OK for the trunk with the obligatory changelog. Thanks!
Committed as rev. 139435.
Thanks again for the quick review!
Daniel