Re: [PATCH, Fortran] PING: Extend gfc_code internal documentation

[Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>]

Hi Daniel,

Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Are there any comments on that one?
Looks OK. Thanks for your fantastic work. Sorry that we don't do timely 
reviews, but somehow real life continues to interfere :-(
Besides, I have the feeling that you know by now more about several part 
of gfortran than some of us does ;-)


Some comments from a non-native speaker:

+This statement-block will be represented in the internal gfortran tree like
+this, were the horizontal link-chains are those induced by the @code{next}


Instead of "like this" I'd use "as follows".

+next @code{ELSEIF} or @code{ELSE} block if there's a chain of them.
+
+@subsection Loops


I'd add another empty line to make it easier to find the @subsections.

+@code{op} member set to @code{EXEC_IF}.  This structure's @code{block}
+member must point to another @code{gfc_code} node being the header of the
+if-block.  This header's @code{op} member must be set to @code{EXEC_IF}, too,

Instead of "being", I'd use "which is".


Tobias,
who had this week his doctoral defense