This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.2.4 vs llvm-2.3/llvm-gcc-4.2.1


Hello!

  In case anyone is interested, I've run the polyhedron benchmarks
on the stock gfortran from gcc 4.2.4 and on the llvm-gfortran from
llvm 2.3/llvm-gcc-4.2.1 using the flags...

-ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -mark

on a 2.33 GHz MacBook Pro and the results were...

Currently, llvm-gfortran only outperforms stock gfortran
in code execution for aermod and induct benchmarks. The

Is it possible for you to profile executables and eventually figure out which (missing?) optimization is responsible for huge runtime difference for aermod and induct exec times? 50% and 33% difference should point to a serious problem in the generated code.


Thanks,
Uros.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]