Re: Gfortran internal tree structure

[Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>]

Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Another thing would be to create a gfc_expr structure next to the 
> gfc_code one; I think those two should be the most important ones, but 
> maybe also gfc_symbol might be of interest?  (Variables, 
> derived-types, procedures are all symbols, right?)

(Loosely related: Regarding the trans*.c generated code, arrays are also 
of interest -- in this case even for users, which want to mix Fortran 
with, e.g., C/C++. See: 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34528  (and also related PR 
34742 and PR 35276). However, for users, the true solutions is the 
enhanced C interoperability TR (technical report) which is currently 
developed.)

> > Incidentally, dump-parse-tree.c could do with updating and, I have no
> > doubt, could always stand some improvement in the format.
> Just one thing:  How can I even use those dump-functions?
-fdump-parse-tree


Tobias