This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: GCC in C++ branch created
- From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
- To: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "Bud Davis" <bdavis9659 at sbcglobal dot net>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:48:41 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC in C++ branch created
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=mJn5GEvdgqi/g/hx9NyC/TfieKEtS6AkhUNfvnnuXxk=; b=wtgwUVXiRFXgcFSG0FwUuCYSAjfsQmlT1UoHXXJlF38OyLJIdQNkwgpIK9/pLtB+gw lXXUqiCJgiGqZBT5t6HBPTdYGEULRg4uawaqBBMJmnU8Gb0PSRYOfml317+aFBMll/g1 KzbDEHyIn2IOqRLwPeVoO9H4J7fW+2m6KdJRs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MXDJ0h5xeuzUObPVzbgCx6az97u/egeB3FkshQvScuxe/HVSQgNoeLmHomqeB/fcRh Wp/W3h9CBp+kSFhXduVyRuEegfS5wNI1LnhjpnwRb7fr1MzYF3sILVyAtECWoMXIbmEq lPG+eRkPiYrv9PNWd3/Kqid3fEH8sY2wNRIsY=
- References: <439792.60051.qm@web81204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <339c37f20806182245s1b1078a1s65a02e3f2bda8bd1@mail.gmail.com> <b609cb3b0806182254p53d7159dl3b4956d8a6d078c1@mail.gmail.com>
> Just a suggestion... perhaps finish f2003 support first?
>
No need for the suggestion... as you will see from the fortran PRs, I
am heavily committed just to get F95 support right, to stop
allocatable components from leaking memory and, yes, F2K support. A
fortran frontend, written in fortran, will remain a temptation:)
On the F2K support, Janus, Sa and Daniel are doing a splendid job.
Due to their efforts are whispers away from finalization,
parameterized derived types and pointer components. I have a
prototype patch for derived type extension running to the point it
parses but loses the parent components (some stupid error somewhere)
and several of us have been discussing the implementation of classes
and dynamic dispatch, off-list. Unfortunately, we all have day-time
work and progress is regrettably slow.
Paul