This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [RFC, Patch, gfortran] make -static-libgfortran work on darwin.

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'FX'" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, "'IainS'" <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
Cc: "'Fortran List'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'GCC Development'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:43:22 +0100
Subject: RE: [RFC, Patch, gfortran] make -static-libgfortran work on darwin.
References: <A6664290-AFD1-4FCE-97E5-01DE56BB8B1D@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <6C3D9E30-D1F7-41F6-961F-AFD711C5BBC4@gmail.com>

FX wrote on 10 June 2008 17:12:

>> The solution is to name the libs differently (as is done elsewhere
>> in gcc).
> 
> Target libraries named differently? Which? 

  Just frex:  When you build static libgcc, you get libgcc.a

  When you build it shared, you get libgcc_s.so (and a static libgcc_eh.a,
for reasons we won't go into here).


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

References:
- [RFC, Patch, gfortran] make -static-libgfortran work on darwin.
  - From: IainS
- Re: [RFC, Patch, gfortran] make -static-libgfortran work on darwin.
  - From: FX

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]