This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [patch] fix recent breakage of darwin, mingw and others
- From: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list at fgznet dot ch>, newnews at gmx dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>, ktietz70 at googlemail dot com
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 22:37:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix recent breakage of darwin, mingw and others
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=bwgh43Jg538D4g8WDqMd7WcR9asAPto34CmAOuiYP40=; b=ESVP+LxS3GXsuD0lJ4SgPBApny1TP4eCdVSWFAx6zEDfU/whk3dpFBQ05phgVR7qMGHnt9+ojLynu7q4/OKwqQEsXwQeceH6UN5OlLUeixal4uDiphBaBwWf/6RCawEVYnC/jlqtwF10dUcQzzNZsPICzHetNrCj3dHNtISBbjo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=m/A4cXUBQP64vgmCtADa1YTH8z/sfy6JM3STLAokeMak+GZwbjQ18o3xh3+DEp9YBMHc5mHCgWUJnCiyJGhnwU7rmX+eSiwuUsQAu/vyCuiXHN1CMHHQ+n4j91EV5TtVMK2KwcXrD1LeNwWN9T4oKw/2KxSOfq3j6KSZFKGvm2Y=
- References: <200805262028.53057.newnews@gmx.de> <483B1B0C.3080803@fgznet.ch>
On Monday 26 May 2008 22:18:20 Andreas Tobler wrote:
> > Assuming no further problems, ok to commit?
>
> This line causes some problems:
>
> + [grep for 'builtin_define_with_int_value' in config/*]
>
> the /* is seen as error in the comment.
Added that part of the comment as an afterthought. Adding comments can not
possibly go wrong, no? There are days one shouldn't get up ...
> Removing the trailing * helps compiling this part.
> But it fails later with undef symbols:
> _darwin_register_objc_includes etc.
>
> Is there another patch missing?
Yes, but it does not exist yet. I'm currently trying to figure out where one
needs to add the appropriate objects to make everything work.
I'm open for suggestions.
Daniel