This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, libfortran][Regression] PR35699

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:30:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch, libfortran][Regression] PR35699
References: <47EB32BB.5080105@verizon.net>

Jerry DeLisle wrote:

:ADDPATCH fortran:

The following patch fixes this problem by moving the code needed to pad the record to next_record_w, waiting for all transfers to complete before going to the next record. I apologize for the breakage.
Regression tested on x86-64-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?
(Will backport in a few days to 4.3)

I decided this was simple enough and committed to trunk.

I will commit to 4.3.1 as well.

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, libfortran][Regression] PR35699
  - From: Thomas Koenig

References:
- [patch, libfortran][Regression] PR35699
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]