This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR34872 - [4.3 Regression] Spurious error in snapshot of 01/18/08: Statement at (1) is not a valid branch target statement for the branch statement at (2)

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:28:31 -0800
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR34872 - [4.3 Regression] Spurious error in snapshot of 01/18/08: Statement at (1) is not a valid branch target statement for the branch statement at (2)
References: <339c37f20801230306q5281a946h3ba02bab3df9af05@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Richard Thomas wrote:

:ADDPATCH fortran:

This is a regression caused by my function characteristics patch.  I
did not take account of the possibility that the first executable
statement might have a lable.  The patch is self-explanatory and the
testcase based on the reporter's.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_ia64/FC8 - OK for trunk?

OK for trunk,

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR34872 - [4.3 Regression] Spurious error in snapshot of 01/18/08: Statement at (1) is not a valid branch target statement for the branch statement at (2)
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR34872 - [4.3 Regression] Spurious error in snapshot of 01/18/08: Statement at (1) is not a valid branch target statement for the branch statement at (2)
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]