This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: about the "installation instructions" link
- From: Bernhard Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- To: jdelia at intec dot unl dot edu dot ar
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:10:44 +0100
- Subject: Re: about the "installation instructions" link
- References: <20080122133357.34wuuuw2040sc4o8@www.intec.ceride.gov.ar>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:33:57PM -0300, jdelia@intec.unl.edu.ar wrote:
> Hello gfortraners,
>
> Two comments and a (nested) question about the "installation instructions"
> link:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries32Linux
>
> On one hand, some text lines are (perhaps) rather out of date, e.g.,
>
> 1) The first line "Somebody has deleted these instructions. Please accept
> our apologies". This comment appears since several months ago (in fact from
> Fri 02 Jun 2006).
>
> 2) At point (iii) appears: "You should see GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0
> 20060602 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
> but the current one is the 4.3.0 version.
>
> 3) On the other hand, which are the differences between "LD_LIBRARY_FLAG"
> and "LD_LIBRARY_PATH" environment flags ? Are BOTH really necessary for
> dynamic link ? that is, perhaps, can be the second one sufficient for 32bit
> x86 systems ?
My binutils doesn't know about LD_LIBRARY_FLAG. Perhaps this
instruction should be removed.