This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [libgfortran,patch] Add fallback functions tgamma, lgamma, tgammaf and lgammaf
- From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Tim Prince <tprince at computer dot org>
- Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:43:44 +0000
- Subject: Re: [libgfortran,patch] Add fallback functions tgamma, lgamma, tgammaf and lgammaf
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=bQgVDtGpfTXkIQC1SiNII9QL+i/STel4bjDeG3f9bok=; b=H33V62gE9ffFqQDqjH35Wh3lT39Gzix6TyB9/Ov4Q73o38NUeWn/hhA2gQiD6e5NGRuAiGOYb0mCmnQUz4QCDsDPO6GT3rWrI6TgwLQajcnrIpMyZC9/b/9MPVf2Gq1urQHrrtMeCAAiuQqDS5kzo+2cRJlr7bqRNmnbrOeVwaA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=cIjxjjm/4kc3pygq3TpeY0iJZY0CAyxMD2mXhreiWcqIKidMo0EVurwcUD8v9qK5XZzkyayrztQ5HQXH/ZBP2Qz0QqlXDZJSz4sHW4uGJ5w0s+s7iKbxfYCCoqi8RYXVigB4dtua7/hNUnHGo2Yi4mzvdfsjIAr8qW9oZU0V60I=
- References: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0711170922001.956@homepc> <A89D0A2D-5CA2-4B9A-8F19-D5B47F36C66D@gmail.com> <473EF7F0.30405@computer.org>
Do you mean submit a patch to support those functions in newlib?
That's even better, and probably easy now that I've contributed a C
implementation to libgfortran.
Do the testsuite results not constitute a report?
I have no idea what the bug reporting instructions for cygwin or
newlib are, but I think it's more something like "open a bugzilla PR
at $URL" than "send a mail to gcc-testresults". And they'd probably
be more convinced with a concise, C program than a long, Fortran
testcase, of course.
FX