This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
patches awaiting approval
- From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:31:47 +0200
- Subject: patches awaiting approval
Dear All,
I have some patches waiting approval. Whilst they are a long way from
needing pinging, my schedule is a bit difficult this year and I am
worried that not only will the patches get bit-rot but I will too.
They are:
(i) PR33554 - [4.3 regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-10/msg00005.html
Note that this suffered some tidying up before submission, with the
result that there is an error :-)
+ /* Initialize INTENT(OUT) derived type dummies. */
+ static tree
+ init_intent_out_dt (gfc_symbol * proc_sym, tree body)
+ {
+ stmtblock_t fnblock;
+ gfc_init_block (&fnblock); /*put this after the declarations!!!! */
+ gfc_formal_arglist *f;
+ gfc_expr *tmpe;
+ tree tmp;
+ tree present;
(ii) PR33550 - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00471.html
okayed by Jerry - thanks
(iii) PR31154 , PR31229 and PR33334 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00457.html
(iv) PR33566 - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00454.html
All these patches have been tested by Dominique, stand up to cp2k/tonto
and so just need somebody to cast an eye over the style. Note that 3 of
these are amongst the remaining 8 on the first line of the Wiki's bug
bashing list.
Another fix, which is rock solid but has not been posted is that to
PR33542 - see the PR itself. I am inclined to apply it as obvious but
would appreciate somebody casting an eye over it. The submission, with
changelogs and testcase is stuck as a draft on a workstation that I
cannot get to until tomorrow.
Cheers
Paul