This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero

From: "Asher Langton" <langton2 at llnl dot gov>
To: "Thomas Koenig" <tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net>
Cc: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:47:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=lHhwSavbUEMakH2loSCZsCv1FJrDayJkddq9zMRoxuY=; b=Ax9/sQsRXZ3eLCG8WZKjS9xfe1fvLBLonJYpCQzXOfCPuyCPRPnv0Wlmdoh0Ddkqe/9Ktjn16P61m4xCVnv/FakUELarZzgaZE7e1YUm8Cm0INfszTljgrEjipGH+jhOBZtsq6+mW577w5mCzS4YfKnja70nQnQY+ndY+pi3GsU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Nk06aM+oiv62xeUKHw59VVDlAVpPjfNCmJ0Od4tAd7812B9aRti0VkoRY3Uuwn0Alkn4KB5gL5Ntm0VrhMLARVbaWQyCtnbK5aQ9K53v3ydQjhPpvEYKBk+rOpB2AKBBFl0OcK0R06NCc648v9iN6Y0wAnHrc+Z55sKJn9/PDP8=
References: <1953a4560708171312u705f5bf4ie9d8ce645d2f02b6@mail.gmail.com> <1953a4560708311456g550c60a8xd4a0ffa9335c4325@mail.gmail.com> <46E7B808.8070104@net-b.de> <1953a4560709140544j491e8e8di6f1b50b4dd0c1ca4@mail.gmail.com> <1190227649.3748.1.camel@meiner.onlinehome.de> <1953a4560709191752r56cb1946xefca63f83c577317@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/19/07, Asher Langton <langton2@llnl.gov> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 07:44 -0500, Asher Langton wrote:
> >
> > Hi Asher,
> >
> > > I will take a
> > > look at equivalenced variables tonight.
> >
> > Any progress?  If you haven't got a round tuit, I'd be in favor of
> > committing right now, and updating the documentation according to
> > Tobias Burnus' suggestion.
>
> Okay, that sounds good to me.  I'd like to look into the equivalence
> issue some more, but the last few days have been quite hectic.  I'll
> put together an updated patch with the added documentation, and then
> deal with the equivalence issue when I have a little more time.

Here's an updated patch.  The Changelog and the tests are the same as here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00666.html

I bootstrapped and regression tested this on x86_64-linux.  Okay to commit?


-Asher

Attachment: gfc070919_214008.diff
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero
  - From: Asher Langton
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [PATCH, fortran] PR20441 -finit-local-zero
  - From: Asher Langton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]