This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gfortran.dg/gamma_(1|2).f90 fail on Darwin

From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
To: fxcoudert at gmail dot com, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, burnus at net-b dot de
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:34:40 +0200
Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/gamma_(1|2).f90 fail on Darwin
References: <20070828133503.905255BBB8@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <19c433eb0708280722m1453bda0i3d7c1ac498dc827@mail.gmail.com>

> I propose the following patch

Seems reasonable to me; but for the new test if "fortran_large_real"
is "true" for systems with real(16): it will give the same failure
since the exponent range is only 291. I think
selected_real_kind (precision (0.0_8) + 1)
is better.

> (cannot test nor commit, sorry)

I can test, but not commit, although I am pretty sure that the patch is OK
excepted for gamma_4.f90.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gfortran.dg/gamma_(1|2).f90 fail on Darwin
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

References:
- gfortran.dg/gamma_(1|2).f90 fail on Darwin
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: gfortran.dg/gamma_(1|2).f90 fail on Darwin
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]