This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
- Cc: "Tobias Schlüter" <Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:27:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH,fortran]: fix bind(c) common block alignment
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zy+Uo9b72ThwyeYfXyu9/g45VmkwoY1KJJHD+0I/FIPJGotZBzyWxXeHRPhs99yvwQSIRdvHmHGZybc0fAB1hygyQEGa6hh3kxU1rmeUsBGq0uL/ilKKzxwDgSliwD3oWeVo9ROw9/D5ayCMgM6Etqfd58xms2Y1Qr9SBHvevP4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dNzLzSJ3eFJptOqR/9tPuWM3klBEdCv0LAFj8mIyI5Zw6VCC/1bfAQREFE9X8fo9VGQ5ds+HWwN5kBWXKmOWhyXrpdgnWxSHzMray4KF2EgM65qoSSIc1XNScmXC1e1qs5GHLho2Hvk3CQOHxEIuAwd3kKc/+O5GAQRhVW3xoRs=
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061050430.7474@lennox.lanl.gov> <46B755C7.3040601@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061111560.7474@lennox.lanl.gov>
> if it is acceptable for all common blocks to choose a C compatible
> alignment, then the patch is trivial to change to do this. is that what
> people prefer?
I think we certainly do not want to rush that decision. I bit of
investigation, seeing what g77 did, what other compilers do, etc. is
certainly necessary before changing an established behaviour.
FX