This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Walter Spector <w6ws at earthlink dot net>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:41:15 -0700
Subject: Re: RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL
References: <46B3F107.2F81A9C4@earthlink.net> <20070804040907.GA39207@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:09:07PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the report.  Can you run 'gfortran --version' and
> report the output?
> 
> With no options, I get
> mobile:kargl[211] gfc4x -o z w.f90
> w.f90:26.8:
> 
>     r = factorial_inner (val * next, next - 1)
>        1
> Error: Function 'factorial_inner' at (1) cannot call itself, as it is
>        not RECURSIVE
> mobile:kargl[212] gfc4x --version
> GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.0 20070802 (experimental)
> 

If I change ELEMENTAL to RECURSIVE in the module. I get a 
type/rank mismatch, which I think is the correct error.

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL
  - From: Walter Spector

References:
- RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL
  - From: Walter Spector
- Re: RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]