This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 on Darwin8
- From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- To: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:01:57 -0400
- Subject: FAIL: gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 on Darwin8
Dominique,
Isn't the failure in gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 likely due to
the fact that gfortran (unlike the gcc and g++ compiler) doesn't
generate the $LDBL128 versions of the symbols for function calls
related to long doubles? Reread the threads...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00495.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00498.html
I believe we need to figure out why Andrew's proposed patch
(discussed in that thread) doesn't really work for the gfortran
compiler and the symbols in the gfortran generated object files
lack the expected appended $LDBL128.
Jack