This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: tprince at computer dot org
- Cc: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:26:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- References: <4178E28C-703E-4CE4-B924-DB2AF192EAC1@gmail.com> <469694A6.1060802@myrealbox.com>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:52:54PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> >
> > * on ia64-linux, gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90 and
> >gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 fail with "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> >-funroll-loops". Andreas or H.J., could you please file a PR with the
> >exact error and a backtrace? The fact that it occurs only at high
> >optimization means it's probably either an optimizer problem or a
> >wrong alignment in the code emitted by the front-end...
> >
> I'll start on this, in case I don't run into HJ to ask if he is doing
> it, or hear that someone else took care of it. I've left my 5-yr-old
> space heater running. Not that I would ever use omit-frame-pointer on
> this target.
Both gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90 and
gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 are runtime error. Both failed at revision
126278. My last working one is revision 126007.
H.J.