This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- From: Tim Prince <tprince at myrealbox dot com>
- To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:52:54 -0700
- Subject: Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- References: <4178E28C-703E-4CE4-B924-DB2AF192EAC1@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: tprince at computer dot org
FX Coudert wrote:
* gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr32417.f90 is failing at -O1 on
many targets: powerpc64-linux (with -m32), powerpc-ibm-aix, hppa-hpux,
hppa-linux, i686-linux, sparc-solaris, s390-linux, i386-freebsd.
Andrew Pinski attributed this to be the same as PR32527; could someone
who has access to any of these (which include i686-linux!) obtain a
backtrace and confirm that it is indeed the same bug?
pr32417.f90 failure on i686-pc-cygwin matches the description in PR32527.
* on ia64-linux, gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90 and
gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 fail with "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops". Andreas or H.J., could you please file a PR with the
exact error and a backtrace? The fact that it occurs only at high
optimization means it's probably either an optimizer problem or a
wrong alignment in the code emitted by the front-end...
I'll start on this, in case I don't run into HJ to ask if he is doing
it, or hear that someone else took care of it. I've left my 5-yr-old
space heater running. Not that I would ever use omit-frame-pointer on
this target.