This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
- To: fxcoudert at gmail dot com, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: schwab at suse dot de, hjl at lucon dot org, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:42:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- References: <4178E28C-703E-4CE4-B924-DB2AF192EAC1@gmail.com>
> * on ppc-darwin, we still have gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90
> and gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 failing, but now
> gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 also fails; could someone tell if it's
> the same failure? (Dominique, maybe?)
I do not see any failure for gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 neither on
powerpc-apple-darwin7 version 4.3.0 20070707 nor on
powerpc-apple-darwin8 version 4.2.0. I have asked once if the
failures could be related to the way gmp/mpfr are built/installed
(in both counts I have used Fink).
I do see the failure of gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr32417.f90
on powerpc-apple-darwin7 version 4.3.0 20070707, but not on
powerpc-apple-darwin8 version 4.2.0.
I am using darwin7 on a G5 under 10.3.9 and darwin8 on a G4 under
10.4.10.
Dominique