This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32157 - intrinsic function name conflicts with subroutine if present in the same file
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:35:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR32157 - intrinsic function name conflicts with subroutine if present in the same file
- References: <4691C110.8040104@wanadoo.fr> <20070709053359.GA75974@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4692913E.5020002@wanadoo.fr>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 09:49:18PM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> Steve,
> >Static functions (which are of course local to a file) should
> >not have a gfc_ prefix. I'll note that this rule is violated
> >in several places.
> >
> >
> I was anticipating usage elsewhere:-) That said, I'll drop it because
> the gfc_ prefix makes nonsense of the Doxygen documentation.
>
This patch is the leading suspect for this regression:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32741
H.J.