This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:42:03 +0100
- Subject: Testsuite results... where do we stand?
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NH3RZ4jsgi2OD4UZxBXvUK+Fy8HQrYCMAqcmCLiA489UmYpYBjyD+LDRsxD77OVg0qfbIUopvEcumiUJUIZxSvymhXOxNPuHCVL/QGEr9Vq/BYbf+D5tYeDgPWCTQDQFIhYkfJ8Jna7zkS0oIcIOqN6bDXBDAnyGoaZZ3kW8l2c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=cSj9lW+JC0XKi5xN8Od1/TIA6AkSYW7iT8AojDxd7XWaCr6lSRfMnOowWggcQ1RH5D8j4tJKNwR4v4xJ+WitKonDWxHAUCqruHrzMJUNRFDHItG8WurxB1ctojCZ8dndnWIUX3oM64y+DochdO/MG92h2eGDoHrjfp4iTQE0T2M=
Hi all,
This is a quick summary of how gfortran currently fares on our own
testsuite for different targets. Once again, we might need some help
from people who actually have access to different targets, but I
thought it would be a good thing to summarize our known testsuite
failures here...
* gfortran.dg/c_kind_params.f90 fails on many targets: powerpc64-
linux (with -m32), powerpc-ibm-aix, hppa-hpux and sparc-sun-solaris.
Christopher, are you investigating this one?
* gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr32417.f90 is failing at -O1
on many targets: powerpc64-linux (with -m32), powerpc-ibm-aix, hppa-
hpux, hppa-linux, i686-linux, sparc-solaris, s390-linux, i386-
freebsd. Andrew Pinski attributed this to be the same as PR32527;
could someone who has access to any of these (which include i686-
linux!) obtain a backtrace and confirm that it is indeed the same bug?
* on ia64-linux, gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90 and
gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 fail with "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -
funroll-loops". Andreas or H.J., could you please file a PR with the
exact error and a backtrace? The fact that it occurs only at high
optimization means it's probably either an optimizer problem or a
wrong alignment in the code emitted by the front-end...
* gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90 fails on ppc-aix and
gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 fails on hppa-hpux; since I
wrote these testcases and the front-end code for that, I'll try to
give it a look (I think I have access to a ppc-aix computer somewhere)
* on i386-freebsd, gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/
stat_2.f90 fail; Steve (Kargl), as our resident FreeBSD expert (your
felt that coming, didn't you?!), would you mind looking into it when
(and if) you have time?
* on ppc-darwin, we still have gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90
and gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 failing, but now
gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 also fails; could someone tell if it's
the same failure? (Dominique, maybe?)
Well, I think I've annoyed enough people today, so that's all folks!
FX
PS: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_nearest.f90 fails on
ppc-aix, but it has done so for a long time (I think it's the
nextafter() system function that doesn't work well there, I remember
looking into it some years ago); maybe I'll xfail it there.