This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] PR32633 - bogus error with implicit SAVE


2007/7/6, Tobias Burnus <burnus@ph2.uni-koeln.de>:
I think you missed the following in the new patch:

>     case FL_PROCEDURE:
> -      conf2 (save);

>  	case PROC_DUMMY:
> -	  conf2 (save);

Nope, both are there, i.e. both occurrences are are removed by the patch.



Additionally, I miss a do-compile test case which fails currently and it
fixed by this patch - just to make sure we will never regress on this
again; the test case should go beyond the test case from PR32633.

Agreed, a save_parameter.f90, alongside save_common.f90 and save_result.f90 should do?!

Thanks
    Daniel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]