This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [patch, fortran] PR32633 - bogus error with implicit SAVE
- From: "Daniel Franke" <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
- To: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at ph2 dot uni-koeln dot de>
- Cc: burnus at net-b dot de, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:39:08 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR32633 - bogus error with implicit SAVE
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jyVr2yQrdil+xdt4fXZ+TWdsUaK5lKa5DNaTaCyd5rft5TdrRk8eSqES44nx0DL6e0VocaIVecJHjNnW1P5g6kcxBoY/g6tro2hoNTLu/RO563w/DeIDqBUlwEsa7JNDDnZf4ZNugKZO/4tuzye0W+1ryhIQOQeh90/lpwncDJ4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XbYxbD4JzO9sW9oI4uXJgGZW+Hrw4mPkyTIgPlJKijNkeg/1EmKikCfgrmGGP8dKYkz3n5x/mfoCXgoXfXiy//Ko6iz/CSSejsQT0UxcMR/0UPdfl6BB1kQLKX27W24M07eW84RvMoBC9HzM3r2QPFWcg7Zhtq7YQMKv17b4n3s=
- References: <1130.134.95.66.147.1183714015.squirrel@www.webmail.uni-koeln.de>
2007/7/6, Tobias Burnus <burnus@ph2.uni-koeln.de>:
I think you missed the following in the new patch:
> case FL_PROCEDURE:
> - conf2 (save);
> case PROC_DUMMY:
> - conf2 (save);
Nope, both are there, i.e. both occurrences are are removed by the patch.
Additionally, I miss a do-compile test case which fails currently and it
fixed by this patch - just to make sure we will never regress on this
again; the test case should go beyond the test case from PR32633.
Agreed, a save_parameter.f90, alongside save_common.f90 and
save_result.f90 should do?!
Thanks
Daniel